Open Letter to the DNC

I am a registered Democrat in New York. I have been a dedicated Democrat for the past 10 years. I am under 40 and am the future of this Party. I have volunteered and canvassed for several Democratic candidates over the last decade, and I vote. Even when the polls are not favorable towards my candidate, or when it's raining and snowing, or when my life is so busy I can barely keep up with it - I vote. And I encourage those I know to vote. And I always encourage them to vote Democratic.

That being said, I am concerned about the tenor of this election. Our party has a former, very popular President who is actively campaigning using the Karl Rove play book to lie and smear another Democratic candidate for President. Bill Clinton isn't running for office, and needs to stop campaigning as if he were. The Clintons are dividing this party, in the same way I fear they will further divide this nation should Hillary Clinton win the nomination. Based on her conduct over the past month, I will never vote for her. And I will encourage any and all who will listen to me, to do the same. Hillary Clinton and her husband, who I used to admire greatly, are resembling Republicans in the way they are conducting their political strategy. The "Swiftboating" that brought John Kerry's campaign down was disgusting, but when we lost that election, at least we knew as a Party that we lost because we held on to our values. I have always been proud that although we lost for two cycles to George Bush, we ran clean and decent campaigns. We finally have a serious contender for the nomination that is moral, full of ideas and hope, and APPEALS to a broad coalition of voters - not just dyed-in-the-wool Dems such as myself, and the last Democratic President to do the same is actively trying to destroy this man's character by LYING about him. Does this make any sense to you?

I am imploring you to send a message to the Clintons to stop this immoral and indecent behavior on the campaign trail. I'm also asking you to consider, when it's time to commit to a nominee, that we are standing at a tremendous precipice of history. Are we as a Party going to nominate an inspired and inspiring candidate - one that the press and people all over the country are comparing to JFK? Or are we going to be the Party that gives into someone who feels entitled to the office because she was married to the last Democrat who held the office - and possibly go down in history as the Party who couldn't get their candidate elected after 8 years of George W. Bush?

Our Democratic Party has always differentiated itself from the Republicans as the Party of the people. The Party that cares. The social policy Party. Are we going to join the Republicans in rewarding dirty politics? Winning through treachery? In forwarding this ridiculous Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton dynasty? What's next? Jeb Bush and then Chelsea Clinton? If the Democratic Party is interested in encouraging a third party to rise in this country, nominate Hillary Clinton. And we'll watch Mike Bloomberg enter the race, and have another Republican in office come Jan. 20, 2009.

We have the opportunity to change this Nation for the better. To restore our image around the world. The Democrats do. But not if the Clintons ruin it for all of us.

Feeling the same way? Send your response to the DNC here.

Obama. The Un-Hillary. It's a Good Thing!

As I mentioned in a previous post, The Clinton campaign's tactics in NH were of the Karl Rove variety. This article in the Washington Post examines just how dirty they were, and speaks to the possible backlash - Democrats unwilling to support Hillary, should she win the Party's nomination. Apparently Hillary is running the risk of permanently ruining her chances in the general election based on her actions in the primary. The article is frank and unflattering. The comments that follow are full of infuriated people.

If Hillary Clinton wins the Democratic nomination, we're likely to have another Republican President. In polls being conducted now, Obama wins in a head to head with all the major Republican candidates. Hillary loses. A national poll released today shows that Obama is picking up momentum amongst Dems across the nation, narrowing a 10% gap to 1%, which falls well within the polls 4.7% plus or minus. Hillary Clinton is a polarizing figure in American politics. For some wrong reasons, and for some right ones. There are those who "just don't like her," or are anti-woman, etc. And there are many of us who have scrutinized her record, her character and her words and find a candidate who doesn't meet our standards for the nomination of President of the United States. And Hillary herself is providing all kinds of examples of terrible behavior on her part in this election, to further polarize her from the American electorate. Hillary might be the only figure reviled enough in the Democratic party to actually lose to a Republican after the nation suffered through 8 years of the worst President we've ever had. Ugh.

Come on Nevada and South Carolina - stand up for Change! And let's hope the uncovering of the dirty tactics in NH, and this ridiculous race baiting crap this week, will lead to some curbed behavior in the Clinton campaign. If you can't campaign and win legitimately in the primary... Don't run! Although, it seemed to work pretty well for George W. Bush. I guess Hillary is using the same "strategery."

It's OK to Believe!

I truly believe the key to Barack Obama winning SC, is telling people that "It's OK to Believe!" Read an article in USA Today online, in which a black woman named Maggie Melvin in SC said that she "yearned" to vote for Barack Obama but was afraid to. Maggie feels that white people won't vote for a black man once they get behind the voting curtain, so she says she is voting for who she believes is the safer choice. I'm sure the stunning results from NH led her to believe that. Maggie believes that white people are saying one thing to pollsters, and then betraying those words when they get into the booth, because of their racism. This makes me sad. Sad to think that that could be true - although I think that that is not what happened in NH - and sad that there is a segment of our society that feels so discriminated against that they believe Barack Obama can't win because he shares the color of their skin.

I'm not naive, I know that there is still very naked and also hidden racial prejudice in America, but we continue to move in a progressive pattern in this country, on all issues, over time. We have gay marriage in Massachusetts, which was voted into law under the State's first black Governor, Deval Patrick. We have a black man and a woman running neck and neck for the Democratic Party's nomination for President - with a white man running a distant third. We have retained a woman's right to choose, despite numerous attempts to overturn it under several Republican administrations, since 1973. No matter how much the Conservatives of this country try and "conserve" the status quo, we are marching forward.

I believe that in my lifetime, I will see a black president, a woman president, probably a black woman president. I will see gay marriage signed into law across this country. My grandkids will probably have to learn Spanish in school, as it will likely become our second language. I know to some this is a nightmare vision of the future, but I'll bet the world we live in today, with its plethora of choices, women in the workplace, openly gay citizens, voting rights for all, etc. was probably the nightmare vision of the future that horrified the Conservatives 100 years ago. And you know what? It turned out all right. Sure, we have a slew of problems that go along with progress - but they had a slew of problems 100 years ago, too. Society will never be perfect, but it can be more fair. And that is a value that progressives cherish, and work for.

To Maggie Melvin of SC, I want to say: people in NH weren't telling pollsters they'd vote for Barack and then getting in the booth and voting for a white candidate. Blatant racists are, unfortunately, not afraid to say so. And the closeted ones aren't going to say they'd vote for Barack (to make themselves look good?) and secretly not vote for him because of his skin color. Closeted racists simply say "I really prefer John Edwards." Or Mitt Romney. Or anyone else with a white face.

What DID happen in NH was the media had christened Obama the double-digit winner, and then Hillary cried. I'm sure John Edwards' insensitive, vaguely sexist response to Hillary crying didn't help matters, either. Women told me over and over again as I canvassed on Primary day - especially middle-aged women - that they were all for Obama until the day before, and then they suddenly felt sorry for Hillary when she cried. They felt like the men were beating up on her. They said they identified with her as a woman trying to do everything and not getting the desired result. They were often apologetic, saying "I really LIKE Obama, I think he was the better choice, but I just really identified with Hillary." Many said the media made them feel like she was going to be handed a drubbing, and many of the women I talked to said they figured Obama would win anyway based on the polls, so they cast a vote for Hillary as a more or less pity vote, thinking it would at least make her loss less of a landslide.

The exit polls confirm there was a 15% shift in middle aged women who said before the polls that they were Obama voters and admitted to voting for Hillary after the election. In this case, the very polls designed to gauge the outcome of the election seem to have had a hand in determining the actual outcome. It was a confluence of unforeseen events.

To Maggie Melvin, and those like her who are afraid to vote for Barack Obama because you think white society won't vote for him, I say, "It's OK to Believe!" First of all, white people are voting for him - overwhelmingly. Not only did he win in Iowa where 95-96% of the population is white, but in the exit polls in NH, the only category of voters he didn't win was middle-aged women. Again, in a nearly white population, all other voters were overwhelmingly for Barack Obama. But that's not the main point. The main point is that if people who want to vote for Barack don't because they don't believe he can win - he WON'T. The very people who "yearn" to vote for him MUST. If these voters don't believe he can win and don't vote for him, they could be the very stumbling block that prevents his win. That's irony. So, to all the Maggie Melvin's out there, the rest of us who DO believe implore you to believe, too. Vote for who you WANT to win, and he can become the one who WILL win. It's OK to believe - in yourself, and in your dreams. This can happen now.

Clintons Playing the Race Card?

Watched Hillary on "Meet the Press" this morning. She's now attempting to paint the Obama campaign with the same stripes the media has been painting her with this past week - implying Obama is lying, exaggerating, and taking her and Bill's comments out of context in an effort to make them look bad. Calling into question the intent and the content of public statements made by Billary that are, if not overtly, at least inadvertently racist, is not the same as spreading innuendo and rumor through the internet. As to Hillary's claims that she fired people in her campaign for their false statements - she let the "Barack is a Muslim and attended a madrassa as a child" rumor fly for the entire NH campaign and didn't, at first, admit to it. Then when it was irrefutably traced back to her campaign, she waited until AFTER she'd eeked out a win in NH before firing the "responsible party" who was probably just some low level fall guy.

As to what Hillary is accusing Barack of - lying about her statements regarding MLK and Bill's now infamous "fairy tale" speech - several black leaders, such as SC Congressman James Clyburn, and concerned journalists were the first to take notice of the pattern of subtle race baiting that both Clintons have been participating in for some time now. The Obama campaign is calling into question direct quotes made by their opponent - that's responsible campaigning. We should ALL be looking at the candidates' records, questioning their intent, and examining their character before we just blindly give them our vote. Apparently Hillary thinks her extremely slow reaction to the slew of lies her campaign is slinging (slow enough to make sure they have enough time to hit and resonate before retracting them after the damage is done) gives her the moral high ground in her eyes, and Obama's calling her to account for her public words makes him "negative." I'm not buying it. And hoping millions of South Carolinians won't either.

You, too, Bill?

I used to like Bill Clinton... But I was SHOCKED by the Clinton campaign's dirty campaigning in NH. I thought that was something only Republicans did. It was like we were fighting against Karl Rove out there on the streets. I had several people - registered Democrats, I might add - who were sure that Obama was a Muslim terrorist that wanted to "take America down from the inside..." And where did they get this info? Why emails from he Clinton campaign, of course. Dis-GUSTING. Seriously, is this what we want from our President? 4 more years of the same crap we've gotten for the last 8? I can say that I loved Barack before I went to NH and totally supported his policies, but now I am FERVENT that he is the right person. We ran such a CLEAN campaign in the NH election, the ethical nature of the Obama campaign in NH came from the top down. And the campaign itself was run from the ground up. Democracy at its best.

If you think Hillary can change and run a positive campaign, here is, essentially, what Bill said on the Sharpton show yesterday - vote for Hillary, because this is her last chance, but Obama will have other opportunities. I.e. - "don't vote for who you think is the best candidate, just throw the old girl a bone, give her a pity vote, because this young kid has time on his side." Using that logic, we all should have voted for Dole in '96. Pathetic. They know her time is past and her potential was always limited. They're just trying to force her on the American public because the value of the Republican party has never been lower, which is her only chance of ever being elected.

I think we owe it to ourselves and the country we love to choose the RIGHT candidate. I'm not suffering through another mediocre President because she feels the Office is owed to her for some reason...

Notes from NH

Moments that stood out from Primary weekend:

• The first day I canvassed, I was really intimidated. It seems so crazy to just walk up to someone's door and knock and then launch into a political discussion with someone you don't really know... But you'd be surprised how many people will talk to you - invite you in, even. I went to the door of one man who had a note by his name that said he was an Independent voter, had been visited by us before and showed he was "leaning towards" voting for Senator Obama. When he answered his door, I apologized for interrupting the football game which was clearly on on the tv behind him. "No problem," he said. I told him I was back because the election was close and I wanted to see if he had any questions about Barack Obama. I gave him a quick run-down as to why I was campaigning for Obama. He listened politely, and when I asked him if he had any questions, he said "No, I think I know who I'm voting for." I asked who, and he said, without irony, "Mitt Romney." There's a strange first and second choice. Romney/Obama '08 anyone?

• As we were doing a visibility in the middle of town on Monday - which basically consists of holding a bunch of signs, whooping and hollering and trying to encourage people to honk as they drive by (silly, I know, but it seems to be a method of all campaigns everywhere) - an elderly woman exited the bank across the street and yelled, "I wouldn't vote for him if he were the last candidate on earth! Obama rhymes with OSAMA!" Um, what?!?

• My friend Heather called a man and as soon as she got him on the line and started her appeal, he said, "Say no more, he's the man!" When she asked if he'd be voting for Obama on Tuesday, he said, "I can't vote." She had his registration information in front of her and said she was sure he was registered, to which he replied, "Yea, but I got convicted of a felony recently..." Whooops!

• Heather also called someone who said flat out, "I don't vote for N***ers." Wow. Didn't think anyone admitted to that anymore.

• I canvassed at a house with a WWII Veteran license plate on the car in the drive. The wife and husband were listed as registered Democrats. A note indicated that the wife had been visited before and said she was "definitely" voting for Barack. The husband answered the door when I called upon them this time. Immediately the husband began ranting that Barack was a liar. I asked him "What do you perceive he's lied about?" He responded "Everything." I asked him to elaborate and he started to explain to me that Barack Obama was a Muslim terrorist who was trying to bring down the US from the inside... I told him we'd have to agree to disagree on that one, and politely excused myself. He told me to be careful on the ice as I left. Wonder if he knew about his terrorist abetting wife?

• The night before the polls, our last task was to hang little "Don't Forget to Vote for Barack!" door hangers on the houses of people who had expressed a strong interest in him. This began at about 7pm at night, right after the surprise rally that Senator Obama had just held in town. Of course we were all "Fired Up and Ready to Go!" Until we got out and started actually doing it. There's nothing worse than sneaking up to someone's house in the dark. Especially in an area where some houses are about 500 feet off the main road, in the pitch black, with a truck in the driveway adorned with an NRA sticker. And a huge "Beware of the Dog" sign on the fence. My friend Heather and I got stuck with a particularly desolate route way on the outskirts of town. All of the sudden we came upon about 400 cars lining either side of the road. We looked at each other and said, "Rally." But for who? Why for Mike HUCKABEE!! The rally was just letting out. So here we are, double parking Heather's car in the middle of the road, both of us exploding out of either side of the vehicle, running - sometimes long distances - to the house on our list, or the house next to the house on our list because it was so dark we couldn't see house numbers, and coming back to giddy Huckabeeans waiting to pull their car out of the spot we'd blocked them into. Imagine the headlines: "Obama Supporter Run Over by Huckabee Backer." At one point, we saw about 6 Goth kids in the full hair and makeup, 8 inch platform boots, etc. getting into their mini-van carrying "Huckabee!" signs and high-fiving each other. Neither of us could figure THAT one out.

• My favorite call was to a man who stopped me in mid-sentence and said, "O-BAH-ma... He's a liberal, right?" I responded, "Well, yes, he's a progressive candidate." To which he replied, "We don't got nuthin' to do with liberals in THIS house. They can all go to HELL," and promptly hung up on me. I smiled as I looked down on his voter registration information: "Registered Democrat."

Getting Out the Vote Obama Style

Just got back from an intense weekend Getting Out The Vote in Rochester, NH. 4 cold nights at a cheap hotel. 3 long days working with some of the most inspired, articulate, kind, caring, informed and fired up people I've ever met. This was about more than politics. We were a movement.

I'm still reeling a little from the end result. I, like everyone else, can't figure out how the polls could have been so wrong... But I am so proud to have gone on my own time, on my own dime and slogged through the wet, slushy streets of NH, knocking on doors and talking to people about Senator Obama.

I learned a lot from being on the ground and talking to Americans in their homes about what is important to them. People are sick of Washington. They are sick of candidates that don't listen to them. Who don't care about the working poor. Who are more concerned with their own ego, than the wants and needs of their constituents. I talked to a man who says he's written numerous letters to his local Congressman about some problems that need to be addressed in his neighborhood and hasn't ever heard back. He said he could remember a time when writing a letter meant getting a response - of some kind. I talked to a 61 year old woman who in her own words, had been just a "sliver above poor" her whole life. She made just enough to not qualify for any public assistance, but was always struggling just to get by. I talked to a man shoveling his neighbor's driveway who had signed up to be a volunteer at the polls because he knew he'd be one of the first people to get to vote on Tuesday. All of these people were voting for Senator Obama. And sadly I talked to a few people who apologetically said that they loved Senator Obama and his message of hope and change, but were too jaded and cynical to believe it was actually possible anymore, and were therefore going to vote for the status quo candidate.

Many people who told me they were not going to vote for Senator Obama apologized to me, saying they felt bad that they weren't voting for him. What a sad statement about the state of affairs in America - that people can't feel good about who they are voting for, and are too afraid/disaffected/cynical to vote for the person they CAN feel good about voting for. We are at a place in our history where the current administration has botched things up so badly, that we have a unique opportunity to shift the paradigm and try something completely different. But the fearmongering of the past 7 1/2 years - while it has people hungry for change - also has them scared. Scared to hope for anything more than "not as bad as it is now."

Barack Obama can bring people together, inspire them, and effect change. He dares to dream big and inspires us to do so. One thing I saw first hand in NH is what his message can accomplish on a grassroots level. Our office was two doors down from another candidate. Let's say that candidate's name is "Billary." Here's a little compare and contrast. Our office was a mess. People were sleeping on the floor in the back room and freshening up in the showerless bathroom. Working, lierally, around the clock. Almost no one in the office was actually paid anything. We were all volunteers who came on our own, and used and gave of our own resources, without complaint and with total commitment. We were told to run a clean, pleasant, professional, courteous ground operation. To NEVER speak badly about anyone else's campaign or person. To never answer a question if we didn't know the answer, but to be sure and get the proper information to the person asking it by calling the office, where someone was available to us at all times. There were volunteers from CA, IA, IN, NY, MA, ME, MD, DC, as well as dozens from the town of Rochester itself.

Billary's office was often empty. There were few volunteers from the area, but many paid operatives from DC. They sat at desks. Their office was neat as a pin. We never ran into them canvassing. We hardly ever came across her literature. Her people seemed largely absent from the area, which was strange. One of the aforementioned paid operatives disclosed that Billary outsourced all the phone calls to a service. Contrast that with our Obama office where we were using our own cell phones to make calls from call lists until the polls closed on Tuesday, because we had more vounteers than phones, and a desire to work until the very last minute. We were told by one of the Billary people that they'd love to come work for Obama if he won the nomination - but we should know that the Billary people would NEVER allow anyone who'd worked the Obama campaign to work for them. As she said, "the Obama people take all comers, the Billaries are very vindictive."

I ran across a lot of misinformation as I canvassed as well. I wondered where it was coming from. Especially since it seemed to be the same two issues over and over again. "I've heard Senator Obama doesn't support a woman's right to choose - got that in an email..." No ma'am, in fact he has received a 100% rating from both Planned Parenthood and NARAL every year he's been in office, his record is adamantly Pro-Life. "I got an email that says that Senator Obama refused to particpate in the Pledge of Allegiance..." No Sir, that's not accurate. When asked where they got this information, all of them said emails from that Billary candidate. These are the politics of Karl Rove. As Democrats, haven't we prided ourselves, in fact, assuaged ourselves after two horrifying national elections, with the knowledge that at least we didn't stoop to the Republicans' level and campaign in the mud? We may not have won in 2000 and 2004, but at least we didn't lie and drag our opponents down with falsehoods and deviousness. Well, the Democrats seem to have their own Karl Rove in their midst now, and whoever s/he is, s/he is working for Billary. After reading Rove's WSJ oped piece on Obama, I'm beginning to wonder if it isn't Karl Rove HIMSELF who's working for Billary...

I got a chance to see Mr. Obama at a rally in Rochester. He was amazing. Especially in dealing fairly and hearing out a small but very vocal group of anti-abortion protesters who began chanting and disrupting the proceedings about 10 minutes in. Senator Obama kept the crowd from booing the protesters or shouting them down with rhetoric or even "Fired Up, Ready to Go!" chants. He asked the protesters if they had any questions for him, or if they wanted to open up dialogue. He asked the crowd to hear them out. Eventually, after the crowd of 1000 just stared at the 10 protestors for about 2 minutes, they petered out and left, unsure as to what to do next, as I'm sure they were prepared to be challenged and stirred up. Left with nothing but our full attention, and no other agenda but to scream the same three words: "Abortion is abomination" over and over, they realized they weren't going to get any traction that way, and left of their own accord. After they left Mr. Obama, who had been in the middle of praising the organization of ground volunteers when the ruckus started, said "That was good ground organization - that's the right of Americans to have their voice heard." And he's right. Watching him deal with that group gave us all a real insight as to how he would deal with those who disagree with him. It was pretty amazing.

To use the campaign terminology - I am more fired up and ready to go than I was before I left for NH. I'm getting active here in my home state, and considering a trip to SC for the final push before primary. Finding a candidate that actually transcends everything you always hope for when you go to place a vote is a little bit like finally falling in love. You've thought for so long that you'd have to settle... But when you find out you don't have to settle - it's the best feeling in the world.